| Epibase® is our structure based approach for in silico T-cell epitope identification. The platform searches for
potential epitopes in complex with HLA receptors in order
to determine their affinity.
T-cell epitope identification algorithms have been around
for over 15 years. Previous generation methods are
mainly driven by the (sequence) analysis of observed
T-cell epitopes.
While these methodologies may work for HLA receptors
where a lot of experimentally described epitopes are
known, they fail to identify epitopes for those HLA alleles
where less data is available.
Because of its structure based approach, Epibase® can
identify epitopes for any HLA sub-type, including those
for which little or no experimental data is available.

Figure: Epibase® assesses the immunogenicity of proteins
and protein regions.
Blue: Epibase® results
Black: Observed T-cell response in 50 healthy donors
(J. Immunol., 2002, 168: 155-161)
HIGH POPULATION COVERAGE
Epibase® addresses HLA Class-I and Class-II allotypes which are present in at least 3% of given populations (such as Caucasian, Oriental, etc,...). Any allotype can be added upon request.
BUILD NEW INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Epibase® has the intrinsic capacity to identify epitopes with atypical sequence motifs. Often, such epitopes are not recognized by learning based methods.
HIGH ACCURACY
Epibase® is significantly more accurate in epitope identification than sequence based methodologies.
Studying the interaction between peptides and their
receptors translates into a larger information content
than merely using the sequences of the peptides.
FAST SCREENING
Epibase® provides low cost information compared to
experimental assays and ensures fast screening compared
to peptide synthesis and MHC presentation experiments.
STANDARDIZED PROFILES
Epibase® is being used by a wide variety of life sciences
companies to compare and address immunogenicity.
Therefore the technology allows easy comparison of data
throughout proteins and protein leads.
Collaborations

Figure: Epibase® shows increased accuracy
compared to previous generation methods.
(Observed (X), Predicted (Y))
|